What Is the Family Medical Leave Act in Florida

You know about how individuals gain control of the ability of the Land and then abuse that power like former US President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a state of war in Iraq which was highly profitable for some U.s.a. businesses.  He accomplished this b y challenge Republic of iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious earth security threat when Republic of iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Republic of iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley xv Feb 2011.

Remember how Bush was supported by United kingdom Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to bring together the US with faked "intelligence" of Iraq'southward weapons of mass destruction which did not exist but which Blair claimed could be deployed within forty minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If yous remember that so you will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Find how they persuade us nosotros are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they can relieve us all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this day.

On CHS we wrote previously about how unscientific the merits is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the affliction came about as a result of the interaction of three completely dissimilar factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, particularly diet and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – whatsoever vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Pocket-size Pox – Large Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty disease called smallpox and it did kill people long ago.

This was especially the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading disease: London's first park built after rich feared disease spread from slums UK The Independent By Andy McSmith Fri 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized Globe.

The center and upper classes needed to be reassured the State would proceed them safe from the threat of illness.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the then truly "great unwashed" masses would exist vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed equally many or more than the affliction itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" notwithstanding contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, UK, USA, Sweden.

Now you tin can read a relatively short but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX MORTALITY- United kingdom, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs below notice the large numbers of deaths acquired by the smallpox vaccine itself.  Past 1901 in the Uk, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished by vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells us. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did not.  On whatever scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the reject in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the residual of the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox expiry rates plummeted [meet tabular array below].  Leicester's approach also cost far less.

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Book as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

TABLE 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Period.	Small-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.eight
British Army (U.k.)	1860-1908	1,355	96	vii.1
British Army (India)	1860-1908	2,753	307	11.i
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.8
Purple Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	8.0
Grand Totals and example fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving upwardly vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	5.1

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Nihon, of the British Army, and of the Purple Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical study were nosotros able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding effect—but on the reverse side."

TABLE 29.

Pocket-size-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Status	Small-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	16.50	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	iii,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	seven,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£ii,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.10	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Md

– Baronial 27, 2013

With the approaching influenza season and the enthusiastic calls to apply the flu vaccine, y'all might exist wondering where the thought of vaccination got its offset. Where did the thought of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an try to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books nowadays a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Most present the aforementioned basic tale of the brilliant observation of a simple land doctor and his courage in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening disease of that fourth dimension – smallpox, or as it was oft chosen the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an viii-year sometime boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes'due south cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd fabricated in Phipps's hands. The boy came down with a slight fever, but nothing more. Later, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a total-blown, admitting mild, instance of the illness. Zip happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once more; once more, nothing. [1]

Edward Jenner'south thought somewhen became known every bit vaccination, which is derived from the Latin discussion for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, just eventually the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would be tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the illness.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly serpent-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner fable has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the mortiferous enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in identify, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

Simply legendary heroes, especially those that are used to back up a belief, achieve an iconic status while any unsavory aspects about the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using pocket-size amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the artillery of healthy people. This idea was introduced to the Western world past Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the practice of inoculation against smallpox, known every bit variolation. This blazon of inoculation was just a affair of infecting a person with smallpox at a time and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do better confronting the disease than if they contracted it at some possibly less desirable fourth dimension and place in the hereafter.

The idea was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. But because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could just exist afforded by the wealthy.[3] The procedure did often help protect the individual that was inoculated, but in that location was still an estimated ii-5% that died every bit a consequence.[four,5] Still, this was an improvement compared to a 20-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] Only, was the difference in mortality due to inoculation alone? Or could it take had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had ameliorate access to more nutritious nutrient and a cleaner environment than the majority of guild?

There was one major and generally unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would have been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practise of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years earlier the introduction of variolation to the 38 years subsequently, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯non decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse bug, because information technology caused more than deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious disease, what tends to cease the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation plainly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where it would not otherwise have been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a center of contagion, whence it spreads non less fatally or widely than it would spread from a eye where the disease should happen in a natural way; these centers of contagion are manifestly multiplied very greatly by Inoculation . . .[seven]

However, while the popularity of variolation varied, the trouble of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Considering variolation had go a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically connected by nigh of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox connected to exist spread by this medically-sanctioned process.

Now enters the hero of our legend. Information technology was rumored amid milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, assertive these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-year-old boy named James Phipps. He took disease matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He afterward deliberately exposed the kid to smallpox as a test to meet if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did not contract clinical smallpox, information technology was causeless that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the apply of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would exist immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Md-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

Merely he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The moo-cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the beginning in that location were problems with Jenner's procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were and so tested by being inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox procedure had been effective. All of them adult smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the report but decided to ignore the results considering they were not in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was quickly embraced past many in the medical profession equally the answer to combating smallpox. Past 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical customs continued to embrace Jenner's ideas amidst numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that at that place were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were still dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the twelvemonth 1799. A month afterwards it was inoculated with minor-pox matter without effect, and a few months after took confluent small-pox and died. 2. A adult female-servant to Mr. Adventure, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual way from milking. Seven years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Infirmary, where she caught minor-pox, and died. 3 and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, three years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted pocket-size-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The kid of Mr. R died of small-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator's name was concealed. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam'southward office . . . died of small-pox a year afterward vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living upwardly to its hope to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Notation that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an eighteen% fatality charge per unit and is essentially the same fatality charge per unit as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This loftier fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a straight challenge to this new and highly lauded medical process.

Another commodity in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Small Pox, who accept previously undergone Vaccination past the about good practitioners, is at present alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with 30 years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practise." But after vaccinating one,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, after vaccination, people nonetheless could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer back up the practice.[13]

Similar today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to embrace it as a new form of income. Information technology is therefore quite significant for a doc to accept spoken out against information technology as Dr. Brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, i, and, two [1820-1822] there was a nifty hubbub about the small-scale-pox. It broke out with the corking epidemic to the north . . . It pressed close to habitation to Dr. Jenner himself . . . Information technology attacked many who had had modest-pox before, and oftentimes severely; nigh to expiry; and of those who had been vaccinated, information technology left some solitary, but fell upon great numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote well-nigh the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to exist an unproven and fraudulent medical do. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons moo-cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, have taken the real pocket-sized-pox later, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![fifteen]

During this time vaccine fabric was the "humanized" form, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the side by side person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, but every bit failures increased at that place was a conventionalities that the vaccine had lost its original supposed say-so, and in that location were calls to obtain fresh material directly from cows.[16]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner actually believed the fabric originated from an infectious condition of horses chosen the "grease." From this and other beliefs, in that location were many attempts to recreate an original moo-cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was simply smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new affliction.[18] This faulty belief would result in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow'due south udder. He so took pus from that moo-cow and used it to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[nineteen] A afterward research adamant that this was nothing more than than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[twenty]

Non only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, but in that location were likewise reports of deaths from other causes shortly after vaccination. For example, a pare condition called erysipelas was a specially prolonged and painful style to die.

. . . a male child from Somers-boondocks, aged five years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (ix days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; one cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, anile 22 years, "small-scale-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; 2 good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, anile 10 weeks, and the son of a saccharide baker, aged 13 weeks, died of "full general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was existence used, other diseases could be spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the Academy at Paris.

Get-go I rejected the thought that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. But facts accumulated more and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I practice this very reluctantly. Now I do not hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was non what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In order to bargain with this, the judicial arrangement intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set up of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nothing to adjourn the trouble of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the corking 1872 epidemic. Afterward 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the near severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no event at all (Graph 1). In fact, more people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years before.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.

By this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were then fabricated for revaccination. Claims were fabricated that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out confronting the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent md of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being fabricated by vaccinators. Immense financial proceeds combined with the force of law created the perfect surround that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western globe.

The public vaccinators accept received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present yr they will get nearly a quarter million. Other sums, as well, which I cannot name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has e'er a dishonest remedy produced and so much proceeds?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. However, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics connected to occur. A swell pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were twenty-three yard four hundred and threescore-nine cases of modest-pox in that regular army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of nine thousand iii hundred and 90-two small-pox patients in London hospitals, six thousand 8 hundred and 50-four had been vaccinated. Seventeen and one-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole state more than than ane hundred and xx-two g vaccinated persons accept suffered from pocket-size-pox . . . Official returns from Frg show that betwixt 1870 and 1885 i one thousand thousand vaccinated persons died from small-scale-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the bang-up sit-in in Leicester England, in 1885. That same yr Leicester'south government, which had pushed for vaccination through the employ of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. Past 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective means that eliminated the need for vaccination. All the same, there were dire predictions from the bulk of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination charge per unit would result in a terrible "massacre," particularly in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town'south residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an middle-opener to the people and an middle-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Here is a great manufacturing town having a population of near a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated by a crucial exam of an experience extending over a flow of more than than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to pocket-sized-pox and far less affected by that disease since it abandoned vaccination than information technology was at a time when ninety-5 per cent of its births were vaccinated and its developed population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was often promoted as a safe process, it often caused sickness or fifty-fifty death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than than 1,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph four).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox bloodshed rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph iii: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph iv: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the stop of the 1800s, smallpox inverse its grapheme. Later the summer of 1897, the severe type of smallpox with its high death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed ane in 5 of its victims to ane that only killed anywhere from 1 in 50 and after to equally low as i in 380. The disease could even so impale, merely having become so much milder, it was frequently mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the South and later gradually spread over the country. The mortality was very low and information technology [smallpox] was usually at get-go mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Periodical of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox death rate was around 20%, equally it had been historically. The table besides showed that after 1896 the death rate fell off rapidly, starting with 6% in 1897 to as depression as 0.26% by 1908. As the mild form of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could be difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, past this time, considered a balmy disease of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a modest communicable disease of childhood, and is chiefly important considering it frequently gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very hard to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new course of smallpox produced little in the way of symptoms, fifty-fifty though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection past vaccination, the course of the disease is extremely balmy. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely depression vaccine coverage rate, in that location was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was not a major issue, the practise of smallpox vaccination connected from the fourth dimension of the last smallpox death in the Us in 1948 upwardly until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a skin status due to vaccination, now existence termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated past the authors to be betwixt one in 20,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality rate of four to forty%.[35] However, they acknowledged that most cases were not reported and in that location was no accurate accounting on this consequence of vaccination. In that location were besides an estimated 200 to 300 deaths every bit the outcome of smallpox vaccination, while during the same time there had only been 1 smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The final smallpox decease in the The states post-obit an importation occurred in 1948, but since that time in that location have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his armed forces male parent subsequently the father was vaccinated. After a prolonged admission, and a calendar week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother too required treatment and virus was institute all over the business firm.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually take been fifty-fifty higher. This study but examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the U.s.. If the deaths were this loftier in a state with a modern wellness-care system, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present beyond the entire world?

There were those in the medical customs who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and perhaps afraid that if nosotros did the accident of some hereafter epidemic might put us in the incorrect. We prefer to allow compulsory vaccination die a natural decease and are relieved that the full general public is not curious enough to demand an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this fourth dimension with vaccination as well-nigh the just medically promoted way to bargain with illness, there were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common food product that is made through fermentation of a multifariousness of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. Thousand. Oliphant, G.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the use of Acerb acrid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as applied to small pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more reliable as a prophylactic in modest-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed two table-spoonfuls of vinegar, after breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the condom treatment died, while amid those under ordinary treatment the mortality was as usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe as well demonstrated vinegar's power to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to have care of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used iii or four times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretarial assistant of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the nifty men who for a century past have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the forepart in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Any person who has been exposed need have no fear of smallpox if he will take 2 or iii tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or four times a day." The word may now be regarded as closed, and smallpox at terminal is conquered![42]

Apple tree cider vinegar might seem lightheaded, simply just because most people have been conditioned to accept the age-onetime prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, affliction-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected animal's (ordinarily a cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or but an extremely poor or unbalanced nutrition. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in peel, bones, and blood vessels and also gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar holding cells together and, as a result, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Section of King'southward College, described the poor nutrition of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and booze while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient nutrition led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gilded miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, equally living nearly entirely upon fried bacon or fat pork and flour made into concoction-cakes, and fried in the fatty, which completely saturates information technology. This is washed down with copious librations of strong coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the nutrition of thousands for months, nether a scorching lord's day, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same time subjected to the most intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Golden Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil War twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in battle.[44] For instance, the causes of expiry listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy straight deemed for at least two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common crusade of death, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a small-scale fraction. Those who were killed in actual boxing or who died equally a result of their wounds accounted only for 1 percentage of the full deaths.

Other large infectious killers such as scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (also known as pertussis) all profoundly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive pass up of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were bachelor (Graph 5 & vi).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping cough mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph 6: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale fable of a country doctor making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical conventionalities that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine faith. But the true history shows us a different reality.

The make name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the globe psyche as something to protect someone from an illness. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of affliction matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific disease. The reality of vaccination is zip close to the myth.

Other extremely constructive alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and take since vanished from societal collective memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner's great discovery and the connected onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more and more vaccines seem like a practiced idea to you?

More information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping coughing, and lost remedies can be found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which can exist found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
ane.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
three.Victor C. Vaughan, MD, Epidemiology and Public Wellness, St. Louis, C.Five. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present Land of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Cognition and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Printing, 2007, p.179.
seven."The Practice of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Magazine and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Example Against Vaccination, Goddard'south Rooms, Gloucester, Jan 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
ten.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What information technology Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
xi."Vaccination by Act of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. VIII, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
thirteen.Mr. Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Book Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
fourteen."Observations past Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Communication to Immature Men and (Incidentally) to Immature Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and periodical of practical medicine, vol. xx, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical periodical, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, MD, "Partial Written report on the Product of Vaccine Virus in the U.s.a.," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Chronicle, Wednesday, Apr 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the Land of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. 4, February 1909, p. l-51.
24."Minor-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Periodical, vol. CIV, no. half dozen, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, April 1911, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.K. W. Harman, Doctor, "A Physician's Argument Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Periodical, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. W. Hodge, MD, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not by the Propagation of Affliction," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. xv.
31.J. Westward. Hodge, MD, "How Pocket-size-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. III, no. 16, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles Five. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious disease as Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United States," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. xiii, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the exercise of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Visitor, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume 1, W.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds MD and Howard A. Joos MD, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Printing, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological dorsum-number," Lancet, January 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
twoscore."Acerb Acid in Carmine Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Scientific discipline, vol. i, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. Half-dozen, no. i, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King'south College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January four to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Do good to Flesh, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Impairment, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, regime, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines |

evansconumpen52.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post